Two seemingly pedestrian events occurred and instead of noting God’s
timely intent for Nigeria as a nation, we all seem as usual, not to be concerned.
And unless the message is driven home, the compelling lesson of national interest
may slip once again.
The timing of the two events could not be more illustrative. Almost simultaneously,
the sale of Nigeria’s telecommunications giant, NITEL to the controversial
TRANSCORP was cancelled just as British Aviation Company, Virgin, was debranding
itself from Nigerian Airways more like mid-air.
In purportedly “debranding” itself from Nigerian Airways, Virgin
Aviation Company was only applying some finesse to cover up the breach of confidence
reposed in the company at the expense of many indigenous Nigerian airlines to
run the Lagos – London – Lagos slot for Nigeria. Some would say
this breach of trust served Nigerian authorities right. But will the lesson
be learnt?
On its part, after the exit of TRANSCORP’s godfather, it was obvious that
the company’s nakedness in fiscal muscle, business sincerity and administrative
competence would inevitably be open for all to see. Contrary to standard practice,
Umaru Yar’Adua’s regime granted TRANSCORP two years of grace to
bring NITEL back to life.
Instead, current revelations are allegations of inability to perform, or pay
staff salaries, vandalisation of NITEL’s major and sensitive equipment
capped by large scale fraud. All these were not the reasons for selling NITEL
to TRANSCORP.
Yet, the colossal failure of TRANSCORP should not convey a message of failure
of other prospective Nigerian telecommunication companies. In fact, tied to
the sudden departure of Virgin Aviation Company from the agreement to run Nigeria
Airways, it is now more imperative for Nigerian economy to be inward-looking
in the search for investors.
Notably, after the failure of TRANSCOP at NITEL, the saving grace for Nigeria
is that another Nigerian telecommunications company, Globacom operates a second
national carrier. Otherwise, what could have been the state of our telephone
services today? The failure of one company must not be dumped or blamed on another
company. The determining factors should be the origin, intent and of course
the performances of each corporate organization which range from one to another.
Accordingly, all willing Nigerian indigenous companies should be allowed to
bid for the re-sale of NITEL. Except in proved cases – Glo, Multilinks,
Starcoms etc. – this is not the time to gamble on so-called foreign investors.
By the way, there is this misconception about these foreigners as being businesslike
or that they are so much in love with Nigerian economic potential. Have we stopped
one moment to realize that they are here to make money and remit their profit
home? And the more profit they make, the more they deplete our foreign reserves.
Was it for nothing that in the recent past, Nigeria’s foreign reserves
dropped massively from almost seventy billion dollars to just over forty billion
dollars? We are talking of capital flight which became more pronounced at the
height of the current world economic recession.
What happened? At that very time the supposed foreign investors should display
their faith to help sustain Nigeria’s economy, our supposed foreign investor
friends chose to withdraw their investment. Hence, the crash of Nigeria’s
stock market.
To now think again of involving the same foreigners as prospective investors
in the re-sale of NITEL? As pioneers or early starters in our mobile telephone
industry, what is the record of these foreign companies? They were more like
economic vermins, and so much of our wealth they remitted home as profits that
a South African newspaper gloated in its banner headline that a named telephone
company “… HITS GOLDMINE IN NIGERIA.”
In the inherent loot of Nigeria’s wealth, these foreign telephone companies
dangled all impossibilities to make them charge tariffs in Nigeria more than
double or even triple the tariffs in Benin Republic and Ghana. With the collusion
of Nigerian telecommunication officials, we were told the obscene disparity
in the tariffs in Nigeria on one hand and neighbouring countries on the other
was due to lack of infrastructure (in Nigeria).
The capital flight from Nigeria by foreign telecommunications companies continued
till the emergence of indigenous companies like Globacom, Multilinks and Starcoms.
Globacom in particular won the hearts of Nigerians by blocking all erstwhile
areas of fraud on innocent subscribers.
Before Globacom, we were told per second billing was not possible. Globacom
came and introduced per second billing, forcing older rivals to introduce per
second billing.
Equally, before Globacom, Nigerians were made to believe that free evening calls
by subscribers was not possible. Globacom, with its loyalty and commitment to
Nigerian subscribers introduced free evening calls by subscribers. Rival mobile
telephone companies were similarly forced to introduce free night calls.
Without indigenous phone companies like Globacom, ripping off of Nigerian subscribers
would have continued by the foreign companies to bloat their profits remitted
out of Nigeria.
What is more, concessions like per second billing and free evening calls are
not for the elites or company executives. Instead, the sole beneficiaries are
millions of poor masses Globacom empowered with access to mobile phone facilities.
If, therefore, we have our own capable telecommunications companies that can
operate our national carrier, why do we have to look outside? And when an emergency
develops like the economic recession, we are abandoned? Or when we demand for
local patronage as Virgin (in the case of Virgin Nigeria) was ordered to operate
from the new Murtala Mohammed local airport, such foreign company arrogantly
bails out?
Even if Globacom is the only capable telecommunications company to bid for the
resale of NITEL (and there is nothing to suggest this) the fact that Glo already
operates as a second national carrier should not disqualify the company. If
anything, that very fact (of already operating as a second national carrier)
should enhance its bid. The performance and value to the country is already
known.
Monopoly? Which monopoly? A monopoly which brings telephone services even to
the rural poor? A monopoly which forced reduction in call rates? A monopoly
which conserves Nigerian money in Nigeria? A monopoly which will not abandon
Nigeria in an emergency? A monopoly by a Nigerian company to preserve the career
prospects and regular salary of long-serving staff as well equipment vandalized
all along?
Do we, therefore, for the fear of monopoly open a sensitive sector of our economy,
in fact, security to foreigners? In this age, how many countries open themselves
to the risk of foreigners in charge of their telecommunications sector if capable
indigenous experts are available? It is not everytime we should look up to foreigners
to solve our problems.
Would a Nigerian airline have abandoned the country as Virgin Aviation Company
did? Even if a group of Nigerian telecommunications company is to be considered,
so be it. The truth, however, is that any willing company should be considered
on its merit.
From position zero, Globacom rose to the challenges of operating a second national
carrier even if the load of other private operators. Should that be a handicap
against bigger responsibilities or opportunities?
Nigerian telecommunications companies on their part must ensure they all bid
strongly for the resale of NITEL.
Challenge for Nigerian women
Just a month ago, Kenya women, in protest against the unending power struggle
between President Kibaki and Prime Minister Odinga, went on a week-long “no
sex” strike. Kenyan women to make their point on the sex strike also wrote
Mrs Kibaki and Mrs Odinga to join in the sex-strike. It was not clear if the
two first ladies complied.
However, on the seventh day (as if they were resting from the sex-strike) Kenyan
women organized a prayer session at which they sought God’s spirit to
touch the hearts of President Kibaki and Prime Minister Odinga.
A Kenyan man exercised his right against the strike by suing his wife to court
for denying him sex throughout the week-long strike.
Could Nigerian women have embarked on such sex-strike in protest against strugglers
for political power? Experts would tell us sex relaxes. But the no sex-strike
somehow relaxed the tension in Kenyan politics.
Take my Ogun State for example. For over a year, there has been this political
enmity between Governor Gbenga Daniel on one hand and majority (almost two thirds)
members of the House of Assembly. Even till this week, the showdown continued.
Here is a challenge for Nigerian women in Ogun State. They should embark on
a lightening warning no-sex strike for a week to start with. Ogun State women
must write Gbenga Daniel’s wife and wives and husbands of all members
of Ogun State cabinet and House of Assembly informing them to join the sex-strike.
The sex holiday must be enforced but can Nigerian women do that?
Perhaps if they do, there may be solution to Ogun crisis. The political combatants
will at least be humoured and draw national or indeed national attention, as
was the case in Kenya.
It is a challenge for Nigerian women.
Calling Niger Delta senators
It is running to a month since the military operations in Niger Delta took everybody
by surprise. That is including Vice President Jonathan Goodluck.
At the early stages of the conflict, some senators raised the matter at the
National Assembly. Somehow, senators critical of the operations, understandably
mainly from Niger Delta, were overwhelmed by their colleagues from other parts
of the country.
Intimidated? Not at that time or so it seemed that they were visibly angry at
the plight and suffering of their constituents. Senate leadership accordingly
adjourned the mater till a fortnight. Unfortunately, it now seems these senators
from Niger Delta were only half-hearted in the concern they raised on the sufferings
of the innocent (repeat innocent) victims of the military operations. Otherwise,
the two-week adjournment has since expired and no senator from Niger Delta (till
this time of writing) has bothered to re-opened the issue of the plight of their
people.
Niger Deltans, remind your senators that you are still to return to your homes
from where you were displaced today.