| |
Who is afraid
of Eze Ndigbo
By Pita Okute and Uzo Chikere
Friday, November 20,
2009
Over the past decade or so, there has been a lingering controversy
over the desirability or otherwise of the emergent institutions
of Eze N digbo in several locations outside the South East.
How did this ‘problem’ originate?
Various sources point to the June 12 imbroglio in 1993, when
Ndigbo fled their various stations en-masse for the South
East.
The troubles they endured on that unscheduled exodus and the
losses they suffered, brought to the fore a glaring dearth
of non-partisan leadership to ensure and protect their fundamental
rights and interests. Many traced the seeming cohesion of
other ethnic groups outside their native homelands to the
availability of such traditional offices. Hausa speaking settlers,
for example, have a Sarkin Hausawa among them to provide the
required leadership.
Neither Ohaneze Ndigbo, the apex Igbo socio-cultural organization,
nor Aka Ikenga, a loose association of Igbo professionals
could fill the gap. A growing number of young hawks who had
made their marks in business and acquired chieftaincy titles
from various communities in Igboland waited in the wings to
assume the mantle. They reasoned, perhaps correctly, that
though Ohaneze Ndigbo signifies the masses and leaders of
the Igbos, the organization was flying like a one-winged bird
outside the homeland: the masses, oha, were there, but the
leadership, eze, was unavClilable.
They sought the support of respected elders across the Niger.
One of such personages was Emeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, the Ikemba
Nnewi, who found willing allies in these men and encouraged
them to form the Igbo Council of Chiefs (ICC) in Lagos in
1998. Furthermore, the ICC received the blessings of Igwe
Emeka Nnaji, then chairman of the Council of Traditional Rulers
of the seven Igbo speaking states of the federation. At first,
the ICC was led by Chief Ralph Uwazuruike, who would go on
in latter years to form the Movement for the Actualization
of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB).
Uwazuruike and the ICC supported the Ikemba in his quest to
give de facto stamp to his undisputed place in Igbo history
by foisting the title of Eze Igbo Gburugburu (Leader of all
Igbos) on himself. Indeed, Ikemba Emeka Ojukwu and ICC were
one and the same. Its motto read, OJUKWU BU EZE IGBO DUM (Ojukwu
is Leader of all the Jgbos). ICC had its secretariat at 29
Queens Drive, the Ikemba’s resIdence in Ikoyi, Lagos.
Nonetheless, the creation of the Gburugburu title tallied
perfectly with the designs to fashion a new political reality
for Ndigbo by creating the required machinery to uphold and
protect their group interests outside their home region.
Ikemba Ojukwu gave every moral support to the ICC. An TCC
report on “Consolidation Efforts” of the Council
referred copiously to his advice for the adoption of a constitution
for the Council and the Bill of Unity he had sponsored. The
document spoke also of incipient disputes within the ranks
of the ICC and several petitions to “Eze Anyi”
(Our Leader, as the Ikemba was addressed).
These disputes arose from the ambitions of various Council
members to be crowr,ed Eze Ndigbo Lagos (Leader of the Igbos
in Lagos). Further leadership tussles down the line to the
local government levels heightened tension within the ICC
and raised serious questions about the need for such an institution
outside the Igbo homeland. The ICC remained in a fractious
condition until late 1998, when a constitution was adopted
and Igwe Ohazulike Omereoha, a businessman residing at Ifako,
Ijaiye, was crowned Eze Ndigbo Lagos. The ICC endorsed his
selection for the stool, so also did Ohaneze Ndigbo, Lagos.
According to the ICC document earlier referred to, “without
the Igbo Council of Chiefs” Igwe Ohazuluike Omeroha
could not have been recognized by Ikemba Ojukwu. The document
also declared that, “Ezeigbo Lagos filled a form and
promised to obey the rules and regulations of the Igbo Council
of Chiefs.”
These efforts prove very clearly that the Ezeigbo phenomenon
enjoyed the support and blessing of prominent Igbos who had
long since desired a non-partisan platform for the protection
of their group interests. Soon, the institution spread to
different parts of the country and various personalities were
installed Ezeigbo of various towns and states of the federation.
However, acrimonious squabbles among wealthy Igbo traders
and businessmen for the position, notably in Taraba and Oyo
states, made it extremely hard to defend the institution as
a unifying platform. Arguments for the scrapping of the office
began to make the rounds in the newspapers. Inevitably, some
of these were the results of disenchantment between the Ohaneze
leadership and Ike mba Chukwuemeka Ojukwu, who was rightly
seen by many as architect of the Ezeigbo institution. Very
many Igbo do not reckon with the highfaluting office of ezeigbo.
The educated professional classes find it to be such poor
comedy. “Ezecrap!” scoffs a computer engineer
who would rather not be named in this write up.
Commentators such as Pini Jason, Livy Iwunze and others have
inveighed against the phenomenon in their columns. Yet, there
is no denying the pull of ezeigbo among segments of the populace,
especially the petty traders and merchant groups.
Nonetheless, the office continued to thrive until recently
when the Council of South East Traditional Rulers mounted
sustained pressure on various states governors and traditional
rulers around the country to withdraw their recognition of
ezeigbos. These efforts paid off in Lagos and Osun states
whose governors made policy statements to the effect that
no one could parade themselves any longer as ezeigbo in these
states. Not everyone agrees with the purported reasons for
this ‘ban’ and the role of the Council of South
East Traditional Rulers in this development.
“The power of any traditional ruler in Igboland should
begin and end in his domain,” says Chief Jude Offor,
a business man at the Computer Village, Ikeja. “The
entire framework of ezigbo is a means of organizing our people
for their social and economic progress. We even have ezigbos
among the Tgbo student communities in the universities. How
then can anyone say they are banning the institution?”
Chief Offor’s position is corroborated by Chief Dan
Nwankwo, a clearing and forwarding agent with offices in Apapa.
“You can not be eze in Igboland and eze in Lagos. They
(traditional rulers) get subvention and allowances from government,
but ezigbos in Lagos and other places spend their own money
to support the cause of the people. They should be encouraged
and not condemned.”
Both chiefs are members of the ezeigbo’s cabinet in
Ikeja. Chief Offor is also peeved that when it pleases the
authorities, they use the ezeigbos to rally the people. He
avers that the ezeigbo was very instrumental to Chief Olusegun
Obasanjo’s campaign efforts in 2003. “Through
him Igbo people from all walks of life attended Obasanjo’s
political rally here in Lagos.”
This organizational clout may now be working against the interests
of the Eze Ndigbo in Lagos. Certain politicians pointedly
accuse him of supporting the PDP gubernatorial aspirant in
Lagos during the 2007 elections. His various business interests
and overt involvement in land matters may also be a cause
for concern in some quarters. Says Ifeanyi “Owelle”
Ayoka, a general goods merchant in Amuwo-Odofin, “Our
people always compare the ezeigbo to the sarki, but the Hausa
leader does not involve himself in petty politics and land
matters. He uses a lot of fronts to get things done. Our own
people are too aggressive, that’s why they attract so
much envy and hatred to themselves. Ezeigbos should insulate
themselves from petty businesses so that they can maintain
the dignity of their office.”
The generally boisterous attitude of the average ezeigbo may
be attributable to their orientation as hard-headed businessmen
with very limited formal education and sophistication. Some
of them are also accused of carrying the toga of their achievement
to their hometowns and villages where they conduct themselves
as the equals, even superiors, of the homebred traditional
rulers. This, say some observers, is the covert reason behind
the campaigns against them by the Council of South East Traditional
Rulers.
But the ezeigbos seem determined to keep their hard earned
recognition among the people. When Igwe Ohazuluike Omeroha
celebrated the 2009 New Yam Festival sometime recently, his
fellow ezeigbos turned out enmasse from several locations
around the country to give him their rousing support. This
should send signal enough that the last has not been heard
about this lingering controversy.
Perhaps, it is merely a storm in a steaming soup pot, but
who really is afraid of ezeigbo? More importantly, why should
anyone consider them a threat to their own political interests?
If the Sarkin Hausawa and various other ethnic chieftains
are allowed to carry on their assigned functions to the people
they are supposed to represent, how can the Ezeigbos be stopped
without infringing on the people’s rights to freedom
of association?
Make
N3 million by referring a bullet-proof car buyer
How
to Get Any Woman You Want. Click Here!
Make
N450,000 Online Monthly. Click Here |