Bakassi handover dangerous
– Senator
From AMOS DUNIA, Abuja
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
|
Photo:
Sun News Publishing |
| |
The presidency has been told to comply with Courts judgment
within the context of the Nigerian Constitution over the handing
over of the Bakassi Peninsula territory to the Republic of
Cameroon as a way of safe-guarding the security of the country.
In a letter to President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua titled,
Bakassi: Before You Handover, Senator Bassey Ewa-Henshaw,
representing Cross River South Senatorial District, under
which the people of Bakassi belong, stated that the entire
issue surrounding Bakassi have turned out to be an intense
struggle between truth and falsehood.
In the letter dated August 1, 2008, a copy of which was obtained
by the Daily Sun from the Presidency, Senator Ewa-Henshaw,
stated that the fact remains that Nigeria has a responsibility
to comply with the provisions of Section 12(1) of the 1999
Constitution by not rubber stamping the Green Tree Agreement
as an independent sovereign state.
He noted that while some may have argued that our Constitution
is inferior to the ICJ ruling and by extension, the Green
Tree Agreement, such argument, he noted, smacks of desperate
move simply to effect the cession of Bakassi, no matter what.
Senator Ewa-Henshaw further stated that the provisions of
the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties particularly
Article 46(1) is unambiguous on the matter.
He quoted the Article 46 (1) which states that:
“A State may not invoke the fact that its consent to
be bound by a treaty has been expressed in violation of a
provision of its internal law regarding competence to conclude
treaties as invalidating its consent unless that violation
was manifest and concerned a rule or its internal law of fundamental
importance”.
Furthermore, Senator Ewa-Henshaw argued that Article 7 of
the Green Tree Agreement equally clarified the matter as it
clearly stated that the agreement shall in no way be misconstrued
as an interpretation or modification of the judgment of the
International Court of Justice of October 10th, 2002.
“Mr. President, our Constitution is our internal law
of fundamental importance and was not complied with at the
time the Green Tree Agreement was signed. The signing of that
agreement violated several sections of the constitution, principally
sections 12 and 14. These violations can and should be remedied
without interfering with our compliance with the judgment
of the ICJ. But the Green Tree Agreement is not the same thing
as the ICJ pronouncement. It is only an instrument which can
be modified without affecting our compliance with the court’s
decision,” Senator Ewa-Henshaw enthused.
The Senator, who is representing the Bakassi people, also
noted that there exist grave security implications of the
Green Tree Agreement for Nigeria, adding that such security
concerns were made known during the Senate Public Hearings
on Bakassi by the military high command, which revealed that
they were not involved in the negotiations which culminated
in the signing of this agreement.
“Whether this was an oversight or a deliberate act of
omission the future will tell. But, they have raised an alarm
that this agreement severely and fundamentally undermines
the security of our country. It precludes Nigerian naval vessels
from using the channel which provides access from the open
sea into Calabar. So the Eastern Naval Command based in Calabar
may as well be closed down leaving the entire eastern flank
of the country unprotected,” he said.
Senator Ewa-Henshaw noted that the development could have
grave consequences for Nigeria in case of external aggression,
saying that the seriousness of the situation may not dawn
on some Nigerians who may think of Calabar as a remote outpost
far away from where they live, stressing that the truth, however,
is that anything happening to Calabar will exact a heavy price
from the rest of the country.
“It is hard to imagine that anyone who loves Nigeria
will insist that we go ahead to implement the Green Tree Agreement
as it is in spite of the dangerous security implication which
our military have pointed out,” Ewa-Henshaw said.
He also noted that given the history of hostilities between
the residents of Bakassi and the Cameroonian gendarmes and
the violent clashes which have taken place in the area in
recent times, it is safe to assume that practically all Nigerians
will leave the area if it is handed over to Cameroon thus
creating a serious problem of accommodation in addition to
the over 4000 refugees occupying a primary school in Ikang.
He also said that records from the Relocation Committee indicates
that accommodation alone will consume over N20 Billion out
of which the Federal Government has so far released about
N2 billion while provision of another N1 Billion was made
in the 2008 budget which is yet to be released.
|