CONFUSION ...As home video mafia bares its fangs
By Chidi Ifenkwem
Saturday, November 13 , 2004

•Gateway to UNN
•Photo By Sun News Publishing

Sometime last month, stakeholders in the Nigerian home video industry returned from a film festival in Abuja to learn that home video film marketers in the Idumota axis in Lagos had handed down a one year boycott on about 12 key artistes.

These artistes included: Richard Mofe-Damijo, Nkem Owoh, Sam Dede, Emeka Ike, Ramsey Nouah, Jim Iyke and Kenneth Okonkwo in the men’s category. The female acts said to have also been banned included Omotola Jolade-Ekeinde, Genevive Nnaji, Stella Damasus-Aboderin, Rita Dominic and Dakore Egbuson.

The first reaction by many to the ban was to dismiss it as a huge joke. Even the affected artistes had laughed it off as perhaps one of such usually stupid antics of the marketers who many of them have, oftentimes to their own detriment, branded illiterates.

Acclaimed king of comedy, Nkem Owoh, was reported to have said: “That’s their business. After banning me, they will unban me”.

Zeb Ejiro, the one popularly called the Sheikh of the industry, was said to have been even more bitter before seriously questioning the rationale behind such a ban by marketers whom he said are not the owners of the industry.

Closer to the end of that month, reports also had it that some of the ‘dumped’ artistes, allegedly facilitated by RMD, had met (eventhough RMD was reportedly absent) at O’jez, a popular hangout located inside the National stadium, to forge a common front to tackle the marketers’ onslaught. The meeting, attended by Omotola, Emeka Ike, Ramson Nouah and Rita Dominic, reportedly ended without any concrete conclusion. Jim Iyke was said to have been absent from that meeting in other not to incur further wrath of the marketers.

Ban, suspension or boycott?
Most people who have been questioning the legitimacy of marketers to hand down a one year no-work–order to artistes who are usually under the employ of producers believe it was simply in excess of their powers. Others have been quarrelling with semantics. Should it be called a ban? Boycott? Suspension? Or what?

Madu Chikwendu, President of the Association of Movie Producers (AMP), while arguing that the marketers lacked the power to impose a ban on artistes, however insisted that it is well within the rights of the Marketers to decide not to market anything they say they don’t want to market. In that case, he refused to call it a ban. “Indeed, they’ve decided to boycott the use of certain individuals which is well within their rights. They said, if you put such people in the movie, we’ll not market such movie. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that. They didn’t say “don’t use these people o!”

Mum is the word
Almost all the Marketers echoed Madu’s last statement when Saturday Sun went in search of Mr. Charles Anyiam, the chairman of their association who was no where to be found. Mr Azubuike Udensi, owner of Consolidated Movies Ltd, pretended to be hearing of the news of the ban for the first time, claiming that the Association which he is part of has banned nobody. He even warned this writer not to associate his name with anything that has to do with the word ‘ban’.

But in a telephone chat with a part owner of another marketing company, he confided in Saturday Sun that the Marketers were “dead serious” with their injunction against those artistes. “They have to stay away for one year. That is our position. And this boycott order or request or ban or whatever took effect from last month (October)”.

Over-priced and rude
When report of the ban first leaked out, the marketers had claimed that this category of artistes were guilty of charging very high fees and gross insubordination, ranging from flouting of shooting schedules – either by perpetually turning up late and keeping others waiting or deliberately staying away outright. And those were not the only charges. However, no particular artiste was pinned down with any particular offence. The blanket charge was that of high fees which, the marketers claim, is seriously eroding their own profitability and threatening their continued stay in the business. However, the charges were simply verbal, thus explaining why the likes of Zeb Ejiro, some of the affected artistes themselves, some members of the Actors Guild, the very constituency supposed to be protecting the interest of the artistes and most other stakeholders who claim to belong to the elite class, have not taken the injunction seriously. Or have pretended not to.

Real reasons behind the ban
Saturday Sun’s investigation reveals however that the real reasons behind this boycott may not be unconnected with the unwholesome attitude and larger than life taste of the affected persons which incidentally the marketers could no longer stomach. According to a marketer who pleaded anonymity. “Could you imagine that almost all these people don’t eat what others eat on set. They always prefer a separate treatment”. For the marketers, most of whom usually put down the money for artistes’ fees and general running costs for virtually all the movies, it is rather ironic that the artistes live like kings while they who bring out the money are treated like social dregs and even scorned by some of the stars whose livelihoods and celebrity lifestyles they sustain.

Omotola
Omotola, Saturday Sun learnt comes to location with mere slippers and must be given “Shoe allowance” for every movie. One marketer revealed that this allowance could go as high as N20,000, otherwise she would not go on set. This is excluding the digit fee that would have been paid as artiste fee. She also would not tolerate sharing a similar diet with other lesser cast members, let alone lodging in the same hotel with them - except the hotel is something from at least a three-star rating.

RMD
Unarguably among the most professional in the land, the case against Richard Mofe Damijo may not be unconnected with his ‘string of exotic cars’ and landed property at VGC. But worse of all, the marketers say RMD’s sometimes stubborn insistence to have 10% of every tape sold (after a stated sales figure) as either royalty or compensation for not meeting up with his terms may have infuriated the traders.

Nkem Owoh
Nkem Owoh’s fame allegedly went into his head so much that he gave an order to the marketers all queuing for him to go pay the whole 100% of his usually non-negotiable artiste fee into his bank account as a first expression of their interest in him. This fee at the peak of his career sometime last year, reportedly ran into millions. A marketer told the Saturday Sun that one day, Nkem Owoh got to his account only to discover to his shock that his deposits was far in excess of N20 million.

Genevieve Nnaji
Nnaji’s sins seem to out-number those of the others. For apart from being liable of all the other offences Omotola was accused of, she was also charged with deliberately shooting up her artiste fee as she liked. Then again she never kept to rehearsal and shooting schedules, preferring to attend all these at her own time. In fact, one of the marketers revealed that they had even toyed with the idea of extending hers and Omotola’s to three full years.

He told of an incident when about three producers and marketers had to wait for Genevieve at the airport with scripts. She had allegedly told each of them to wait for her at the airport only to come and take one script scuff at another and simply ignored the third and walked away.
Unfortunately, neither the star actress nor any of her affected colleagues is responding to all these allegations.

Stella Damasus-Aboderin
Also liable for the other offences, Stella bears the burden of yet another offence: the marketers accuse her of sometimes taking money, appearing in some scenes and disappearing without finishing the contract.

Kenneth Okonkwo (Andy)
Even though, he too is a marketer, Kenneth’s desire to join the league of the big earning stars seems to have been his major undoing. When he queried his inclusion in the deadly list of the ‘damned’, even when he ate from the same bowl as fellow marketers, he was given the clear message: “We are banning Kenneth Okonkwo, not Goal Productions”, that is, Kenneth’s marketing outfit. In other words, Okonkwo will still be free to market films but should not star in any, even if the one sponsored by himself, otherwise he would face the music. Okonkwo (known more as Andy Okeke for his role in the ground-breaking Living in Bondage), said our source, joined the ‘big boys’ when he realised that ‘small boys’ like Jim Iyke, Emeka Ike and even Ramsey Nouah were asking for, and receiving, very heavy fees. He too allegedly decided to up his charges, as a veteran, and one acclaimed to be good for that matter.

Ramsey Nouah
Ramsey’s problem with marketers as we reported in this paper a couple of months back still traces back to his sudden attitude of asking for as high as 800,000 to N1 million just because Emeka Ike, whom he considered as his contemporary, was being paid up to that amount. His case was even worsened when news came to the industry that he uses the latest technology in television simply referred to as the big screen which reputedly gulped some millions if naira. “Can you imagine that”, asked one peeved marketer. “If you go there, to show him a script, he will always be playing computer games, without even giving you attention”, the marketer added in anger.

Jim Iyke
Jim clearly shot himself in the foot when he returned from his latest overseas trip to announce that he wouldn’t be taking any job less than N1m. “It seems it was the trip that tripped him because he was not like that before”, said a source at Idumota. But since the news of the ban hit home, Ike appears to be the only one that has been taking it calm. He was said to have boycotted the meeting called by his colleagues at O’jez, preferring instead the option of negotiation.

The Mafian Angle
Except that the Italian mafians in the United States mostly engage in illegal underground businesses, one would have had no difficulty likening the modus operandi of the Idumota Marketers to those mafians. Here are a group of traders that travel to any country in the world where tapes are made to place orders. Most of them have succeeded to the point that they get the makers to brand their names on these tapes. Others end up securing total franchise to import such products into Nigeria. They were able to achieve this due to sheer persistence over a long period of time. This level of monopoly, therefore, has ensured that whoever in Nigeria that now wants to acquire these tapes for any type of use must go through them. And with a legal union or association already formed for that purpose, it becomes easy for them to frustrate the efforts of anybody outside their union thinking of importing such products without going through them.

Now, if Nkem Owoh says it is the marketers who need him more and not vice versa and Omotola believes that it is the viewers who would have the final say about who they actually would like to see in a movie and not the marketers, that still does not water down the powers of the marketing mafia. For, harmless and uneducated as they might seem, they tend to have all it takes to ruin and frustrate any artiste out of the industry.

This is more so against the backdrop of the sorry state of the Film Co-operative Market, launched last year by a group of starry-eyed practitioners in the industry who claimed to have had it up to their necks with all sort of cheating and victimization from the marketers at Idumota.

Led by Don Pedro Obaseki and Peace Fiberesima and a whole mixture of producers, directors, writers and actors all united by one common grudge: to get rid of the Idumota traders, they had come together. But the story of that market is better told in secret. Not only has the place turned to a ghost land, its major players have in recent times, fallen back to the Idumota marketers for one joint deal or another.
A visit by Saturday Sun to the market, located on Babs Animasaun street, Surulere showed that most stalls were under lock and key at an hour when there would be total traffic jam at the composite Idumota market. The stall owned by Don Pedro, whom we learnt, by the way, has been removed as the chairman of the co-operative, was said to have been closed for months. In fact, a recent flick produced and directed by Don Pedro Obaseki for Konia Concepts is surprisingly being released by Ulzee Limited and not Film Co-operative Market.

Both Zeb Ejiro, his brother, Chico, Paul Obazele, Ralph Nwadike, Peace Fiberesima, Sunny MacDon W, Fred Amata and others all own stalls in that market. They all started out with the tall dream of coming to add some enlightenment into the marketing angle of films which they believed was being messed up by the illiterate Idumota traders. Their grand expectation was to infuse some educated gimmicks into the whole thing so that before anybody could pronounce the word Idumota the co-operative’d already be selling Nigerian films in Hollywood.

The Co-operative today
The full story of the Co-operative Market will be adequate for another day, but for now suffice it that that lofty dream has been put in abeyance for now. A few months ago, Zeb Ejiro publicly announced losing some millions in a film that the so-called Film Co-operative market reportedly released. Ejiro had vowed not to make such mistake again.

Our source also pointed out that even before the advent of the Film market, some persons, who also claimed to be ‘educated’ had tried their hands on marketeing their films, “what happened to them?” he asked rhetorically, citing the instances of Amaka Igwe, Zeb Ejiro, Ken Nnebue, Zack Orji and a host of others.

The truth
Saturday Sun learnt that it may be near impossible breaking the stranglehold of the marketers, especially since they are the ones who sponsor these films too. “Don’t forget that it was still these boys that made these stars what they are today”, one producer stated, adding: “The problem is that they are too impatient. Once a particular film sells well, they all troop to the lead artiste that acted that film and price him, most times, out of proportion, even if it meant telling the same story in another form. But, it’s good they are coming back to their right senses. I think it’s more of the function of the economy than anything anybody would want to say about it.”

Even if we accept this submission, it then adds strength to the earlier argument that the combination of the Idumota, Onitsha and Aba film marketers associations have grown into a powerful cartel that, like the Italian Mafians, can make a person a star today and tomorrow, decide to unmake him or her.

Confusions reigns
The boycott order, having not being documented in any form, has thrown up three points of confusions. The first is the confusion in the minds of the boycotted artistes and their many sympathisers whether the ban stops at film shot by the artistes within the territory of Nigeria by Nigerian producers within their association or does it extend to any film at all featuring any of such artistes whether shot in Nigeria or not and whether produced and directed and financed by foreigners. This is a very important angle which the Marketers need to turn their minds to.

The second confusion borders on the moral ability of the marketers to all abide by their own injunction. Good, they’ve announced a penalty of N500,000 plus a 6-month suspension of any marketer that flouts the order, but given the human angle of greed and the temptation of Nigerians to make quick money, what stops a marketer from knocking down the rules and using any of the boycotted artistes to shore up his sales and, if shove comes to push, pull out from the association?

The third confusion is the possibility of the marketers being able to raise these artistes back to their former positions of stardom, given that the new breed artistes that would be taking over the scene would have grown to equal, if not, surpass their stature by the time the ban would be lifted.

Advantage
One major advantage of the boycott, most people that spoke to SS believe though, is the room it will give to the industry to thrust new talents unto the stage. Majority of movie lovers, it was discovered, were long fed up with watching these same artistes repeat almost similar lines and actions over and over again in different films to the point that most of them reportedly read their scripts only once and mount the set to deliver their lines. And, surprisingly, still had all the awards and trophies reserved for them at every movie award ceremony.

 

 


 

 

 

 

HOME | ABOUT THE SUN | SPORTS | POLITICS | NEWS | COLUMNISTS | CONTACT US I ADVERT RATE
© 2004 THE SUN PUBLISHING LTD. This service is provided on The Sun Newspapers' standard terms and conditions in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
To inquire about a licence to reproduce material and other inquiries, Contact Us.