Two ministers sing different
tunes over NICON Insurance
By ISAAC ANUMIHE, Abuja
Monday, March 31, 2008
 |
•
Jimoh Ibrahim
Photo: Sun News Publishing
|
| |
Recently, two ministers sang discordant tunes over the ownership
of NICON Insurance and Nig Re, thus exposing the sour relationship
between them. It began with the takeover of the two firms
by the Federal Government who alleged mismanagement of the
insurance companies and the refusal of the former Group Managing
Director (GMD), Mr Jimoh Ibrahim to appear before an investigation
committee set up to probe the recapitalisation of insurance
companies.
Prior to the takeover, Minister of Finance, Dr Shamsudeen
Usman who spoke through the Minister of State for Finance,
Mr Remi Babalola said that National Insurance Commission (NAICOM),
has been empowered to administratively undertake the verification
of NICON Insurance Plc and Nigeria Re-Insurance, both companies
which, according to the minister, government has substantial
interest in.
The minister also pointed out that the step was taken in compliance
with the provisions of the Insurance Act. Among the mandates
of NAICOM include a complete reorganisation, restructuring
and automation of the activities and business processes to
meet the existing and expanded demands of its mandate; issuance
of final licences to the 49 companies which were recertified
to operate as insurers/re-insurers, in order to position the
sector on the part of sustainable long term growth. The minister
said, this is “part of measures by the present government
to remove Nigeria’s insurance sector from its globally
insignificant and underdeveloped stage.”
But this decision did not go down well with Jimoh Ibrahim
who headed for the courts to challenge the decision of the
government. The Minister of Finance and the Attorney General
of the Federation were named as defendants. In the courts,
the two defendants sang different tunes as they did not agree
on the terms of settlement which the Attorney General of the
Federation(AGF) spearheaded.
The AGF’s action did not go down well with other defendants
who took the matter to the President. In a letter signed by
Babalola and addressed to the Attorney-General of the Federation
referenced FMF/HMSF/ Vol.1/098 and dated March 3, 2008 stated:
“I write to intimate you that I am in receipt of a letter
from the Chief of Staff to the President and Commander-in-Chief
of the Armed Forces of Nigeria referenced SH/COS/08/ A/3156
and dated 28th February 2008 addressed to your office and
mine. I am also in receipt of a document titled ‘Terms
of Settlement’ which was signed by you and the solicitors
to the plaintiffs in this matter dated 3rd March, 2008 and
bearing the stamp of the Federal High Court, Abuja.
“This agreement was unilaterally entered into without
any consultation with the Federal Ministry of Finance and
the National Insurance Commission who are also defendants
in this matter.
I wish to state that Paragraph 4 of the terms of agreement
which states inter alia ‘that only identified infraction
shall be communicated to all owners of the plaintiffs and
the plaintiffs be given reasonable time in accordance with
law to address the breaches in a manner that will not compromise
both of NAICOM and the insurance industry’ is completely
at variance with the aforesaid directives of Mr President”
Also citing paragraph (b) of the directives of the President
and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed of Nigeria, he stated:
“The identified infractions be communicated to all owners
of NICON as reason for the intervention and NICON be made
to address the breaches in a manner that will not compromise
both position of NAICOM and the Insurance Industry.”
he said, insisting that the ‘Terms of Settlement’
as stated clearly avoided mentioning or taking cognisance
of Paragraph (c) of the president’s directive which
stated, “that the work of the Interim Board and External
Auditors be aligned with the detected infractions which must
be clearly stated and understood by NICON and the public as
something legal and routineous devoid of misinterpretation
and misrepresentation.”
Similarly, the Minister of State for Finance argued that what
the said ‘Terms of Settlement’ referred to in
Paragraph (iii) was false and a misrepresentation of the facts.
For him, “the said Terms of Settlement alluded in Paragraph
(iii) that, “the government also took certain steps
such as the takeover of NICON Insurance Plc and Nigeria Re-Insurance
Corporation and the constitution of an Interim Management
and Board for the two companies. This is false and a misrepresentation
of facts,” he noted. This disagreement has, therefore,
thrown industry watchers into confusion. So, the question
on everybody’s lips is, what is the interest of the
two ministers in an enterprise?
|