VP
seat: Supreme Court decides Atiku’s fate today •INEC hints
By FRANCIS AWOWOLE-BROWNE, Abuja Thursday,
March 29, 2007
 | •
Prof. Iwu |
| |
Fears that next
month’s general elections may not hold heightened on Wednesday when the
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared that recent developments
may after all stall the polls. According to the electoral body, "we are
losing the game."
In a clear contrast to the position of the INEC
chairman, Professor Maurice Iwu, who has consistently maintained that under no
circumstances would the election be shifted, Federal Commissioner and Chairman
of INEC Information and Publicity Committee, Barrister Phillips Umeadi, while
briefing newsmen on the commission’s activities, expressed doubt over the
likelihood of the election holding owing primarily, to the spate of court judgments
against the commission as they relate to listing, for election, names for candidates
earlier disqualified.
He said that although the commission would work hard
to ensure the election holds as scheduled," the way things are going, at
the end of the day, we may be boxed into a situation whereby it would be difficult
for election to hold. As I speak to you, most sincerely, we might be boxed into
a tight situation if the courts continue to give rulings against us, concerning
listing of candidates."
The INEC commissioner, who was reacting to
a court’s ruling on Wednesday asking the electoral body to list former Governor
Chris Ngige as Alliance for Congress (AC) governorship candidate for Anambra State,
wondered what will happen after the INEC might have appealed some of the rulings
and loses the cases few days to the elections.
Umeadi said that the commission
had already taken deliveries of the ballot papers for the elections and that "the
biggest printing machine in the world could only print 1.2 million ballot papers
a day, and with 61.5 registered voters, if the court rules that we include names
of candidates, like that of Alhaji Atiku at the late hour, what do we do? There
will be no end to this issue of candidacy controversies and it appears we are
losing the game.
"Don’t forget that the National Democratic
Party (NDP) is in court seeking to stop the election. What if they get an order
in that respect? We just have to obey the order," he stressed. The INEC
commissioner argued that the situation got dicey because the commission has got
to obey court orders, though it would appeal those it could and accept those it
could not appeal against, adding that the fact that the INEC would be appealing
some of the court rulings should not be mistaken to be that it is partial "We
remain the umpire that we are," he said.
On the Ngige matter, the
INEC boss told the former governor to exercise patience as the commission would
appeal the ruling, even though it was yet to receive the judgment. On the state
of preparedness of the commission, Umeadi disclosed that a total of 1,009,374
persons would be needed for the elections, made up of 1642 returning officers
appointed mainly from among the INEC staff, with the presidential election having
470 officers; governorship and state Houses of Assembly election having 1026 returning
officers.
He explained that the INEC chairman would be the number one returning
officer for the presidential elections with 360 INEC staff serving as returning
officer for the Federal constituencies elections. Said he: " There will
be 1642 returning officers for the elections. This will be broken down as follows:
governorship and House of Assembly 1026, presidential and National Assembly, 470;
FCT area council chairmanship and councillorship, 68 and add five percent to it
and we have a total of 1642 returning officers for the elections.
This
1026 will be as follows: 36 resident electoral commissioners, they are statutorily
returning officers provided by law; six resident commissioners will act as governorship
returning officers; 768 electoral officers will serve as state Houses of Assembly
returning officers, while there are 222 management staff from the 36 state offices,
which is seven per state and we have further broken down the statute because as
you will appreciate"
It would be recalled that Professor Iwu had,
times without number, boasted that nothing would stop the elections from holding
despite the series of court cases instituted by aggrieved candidates, saying it
was because of this that his commission would appeal any ruling that tends to
disrupt the transition process and the INEC time table. |