Why Ribadu must go, by Col
Umar
By KENNY ASHAKA, Kaduna
Thursday, January 3, 2008
 |
Mallam
Nuhu Ribadu
Photo: The Sun
Publishing
|
| |
Former Military Governor of old Kaduna State, Col. Abubakar
Dangiwa Umar (rtd) has stirred further controversy on the
redeployment of Mallam Nuhu Ribadu as Chairman of the Economic
and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
Umar said the EFCC Chairman should quit the job because his
appointment was irregular in the first place.
He said although Ribadu would deliver on any task assigned
to him, his low level experience needs the guidance of an
honest leader.
“I am sorry to say that such environment was most lacking
when Nuhu was prematurely appointed as Chairman of EFCC on
the insistence of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar; definitely
due to their common geographical extraction”, he added.
The former Military Governor made this assertion while fielding
questions from newsmen in Kaduna in what apparently was his
first reaction to the EFCC saga .
Why Ribadu must go
While many say that the decision to post Nuhu Ribadu out is
aimed at frustrating the ongoing trial of the President’s
former governor colleagues, Umar thinks otherwise, anchoring
his belief on the exigencies of the time.
According to him, “Nuhu found himself operating under
the tutelage of a most dishonest boss, President Obasanjo.
He was under the false impression that Obasanjo was sincere
in his fight against corruption. And who would not be deceived
considering the saintly image of Obasanjo up to the point
of his first election in 1999 and the beautiful rhetorics
and declarations he delivered in his inaugural speech in which
he promised to restore the years the locust had eaten, to
step on toes and have no scared cows in his war against corruption.
When therefore Nuhu was appointed, he accepted the challenge
with great zeal, some will even say overzealousness
“But very soon, it became apparent to most observers
that former President Obasanjo had some other plans for setting
up the EFCC and such plans ran counter to the fight against
corruption.
“Instead, the EFCC was slanted to fight against the
opponents of former President Obasanjo and to also use the
institution to cover up Obasanjo’s monumental corruption.
I have it on good authority that the EFCC Chairman was troubled
and thoroughly embarrassed by Obasanjo’s hypocrisy and
double standard. I still cannot understand why Nuhu couldn’t
take the honourable path of resignation once he became aware
of the President’s antics. I was shocked that the chairman
could bear false witness that Obasanjo was not personally
corrupt.
He vouched for the integrity of Obasanjo at a time when he
had caused to be stolen well over 50 billion dollars through
highly inflated contracts, illegal duty waivers and concessions,
mismanagement of the Federations Account and scandalous NNPC
transactions and a most criminal, opaque privatization of
public treasures to his business associates and cronies. When
Obasanjo embarked on total genocidal war against his political
and business opponents, the EFCC became the most useful and
loyal force that was used.
It acquitted itself disregarding all the recognized war conventions.
A good example was the corruption advisory list issued on
the instruction of President Obasanjo and his party, the PDP
which led to the illegal disqualifications of all strong opposition
members. It is a measure of the extent of that illegality
that many election results are being reversed by tribunals
including those of five state governors and still counting”.
Where Ribadu failed
In assessing the EFCC, Umar said although the anti graft body
had carried out the anti- corruption war with some measure
of seriousness, it does not deserve the credit being showered
on it.
Asked if the prosecution of a former Inspector General of
Police and former Governor Diepreye Alamieyeseigha of Bayelsa
State and the recovering of over N500 billion from criminals
were not laudable achievements, the former Military Governor
shot back, beginning with the case of the former Inspector
General of Police, Alhaji Tafa Balogun.
Umar said the culprit in the case was not Tafa Balogun, but
President Obasanjo who he said aided and abetted the former
IGP to embezzle the funds.
“I ask you what was the Police Force annual budget for
the whole period that Balogun headed the force? How was it
possible for the IGP, working directly under the President
who declared war against corruption, to embezzle over N17
billion without the knowledge of the same President? Tafa
Balogun was used as a scape goat. He served Obasanjo’s
purpose which explained his ridiculously light sentence of
six months mostly served in hospital and his house.
“The case of the former governors of Bayelsa State and
Plateau goes to prove our claim that the EFCC was used to
torment the opposition. They were only victims of the Obasanjo-Atiku
feud since they remained loyal to the Vice President. Otherwise,
how come they were the only two governors targeted in any
serious manner in the fight against corruption?
“I ask you why was Bode George not prosecuted by the
EFCC? The president prevented this from happening. In fact,
even when Nuhu established a prima-facie case against Bode
George, the president threw back the report on the pretext
that the EFCC was not specific in identifying individual culprits.
The EFCC Chairman was forced to exonerate Bode George by ridiculously
claiming that Bode was only a Board Chairman and not the Chief
Executive of NPA and could therefore not be held responsible
for any contract fraud, as if he is unaware of the powers
of the board in contract awards which of course are higher
than that of the management.”
Speaking on the monies recovered from those found guilty,
Umar said it is yet uncertain how much has been retrieved.
He, however, called on the EFCC to expose those from whom
such monies have been recovered, saying he is reluctant to
praise the anti-graft agency.
He referred to the CNPP’s allegation that over N2 trillion
perished under Obasanjo’s watch and wondered what the
N500 billion recovered by the anti-graft body means to Nigerians.
Obasanjo’s hypocrisy, Ribadu’s gain
Umar’s response to the question on the coincidence of
Ribadu’s redeployment and the prosecution of former
governors? He said Ribadu’s appointment was irregular
in the first place going by the Act which set up the EFCC.
Quoting from the Act, the former military governor said: “the
Act provides for a Chairman and Chief Executive and Board
members representing the security services.
“The representative of the Police must be of the rank
of an AIG. But when Nuhu was appointed, he was only an AC,
meaning he was too junior in rank and therefore expected to
attended many police and other professional courses if he
is to remain in police service. The NIPPS happened to be a
requirement for promotion to the top echelon of the security
services. So, the exigencies of the police service require
Nuhu to proceed on course. Please do a check on the seniority
of Nuhu in the police.
It is Obasanjo that catapulted him to the rank of AIG over
his mates and some of his superiors so as to unduly exaggerate
the achievements of EFCC under him in its war against corruption.
It is all part of Obasanjo’s dishonesty and hypocrisy.
He decided to decorate his generals after being routed in
a war. He surrendered to corruption, but he still has to publish
another book on His Command.”
Why Obasanjo’s policies must be reversed
People also see the removal of Nuhu Ribadu as one more evidence
that Yar’Adua is intent on reversing all the policies
of Obasanjo’s administration. Could this not be true?
To answer the question, Umar went down memory lane, enunciating
some of the policies of the Obasanjo administration. In his
estimation, Yar’Adua’s government in incapable
of reversing all the policies of that administration.
“But there is real and urgent need to reverse all those
bad policies and they are so many. You must remember that
the main reason Obasanjo was elected in 1999, against all
odds, was to pull this country back from the brink. It was
expected that with his saintly image which has since been
debunked, he would restore the years that the locust had eaten.
He would reverse the rot. Luck played into his hand. The nation
witnessed an unprecedented rise in its finance, thanks to
the high rise in oil revenue. It was like God had blessed
us with manna from heaven. What did our messiah do? He decided
to restructure the nation on a very weak and shaky foundation.
Our social, political and economic structure has been built
on cronyism, nepotism and greed.
His policies have encouraged primitive and criminal appropriation
of public wealth by a few to the detriment of the many. Obasanjo’s
policies have pauperized majority of Nigerians. Over 70 percent
of the people have fallen below poverty line while less than
two percent of the population controls over 60 percent of
our nation’s wealth. He has pushed the nation further
on the precipice. It is therefore in the best interest of
the nation that such policies are reversed.”
|