You can’t stop godfathers–
Iwuanyanwu
By CHIDI OBINECHE
Monday, July 14, 2008

|
•Chief
Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu
Photo: Sun News Publishing |
| |
Business mogul and chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party,
PDP, Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu has endorsed the concept of
godfatherism in politics, saying, it is a worldwide practice.
Dismissing the notion that godfatherism had been the bane
of Nigerian politics with the unorthodox way it was used in
Oyo and Anambra states to harrass elected public officials,
Iwuanyanwu urged newbreed politicians “to get close
to them, study them and know what they are doing. Be part
of them, so that you can know what qualities in them took
them to where they are.”
The Champion newspapers publisher, who is convalescing after
a major knee surgery in the United States of America, spoke
to Daily Sun in his palatial Victoria Island, Lagos home.
He continued: “I don’t think that type of system
will stop. There is no time in politics in Nigeria when you
won’t have people who have been there. You will have
leaders and these leaders must exercise their powers in accordance
with the constitution of the party.”
He, however, objected to godfathers employing violence and
coercion to appropriate by force power that belongs to the
party.
Iwuanyanwu further lamented the parlous state of the nation’s
economy, which had fuelled poverty and youth unemployment,
describing it as a time bomb waiting to explode.
He urged the government to take urgent measures to arrest
the situation, suggesting as a first step, the government
set up a committee to look into the situation.
He also spoke on contemporary national issues, including electoral
reforms, appointment of chairman of the Independent National
electoral Commission, (INEC), PDP, President Yar’Adua
and opposition parties.
Excerpts:
You have been out of circulation for some time. Where
have you been?
I have been on vacation. Every year, I take a vacation. But
this year, in addition to my vacation, I went for a medical
check-up. Some years ago, I had an injury on my left leg which
has continued to worry me. So I went to John Hopkins hospital
in the United States of America and they removed the kneecap
and replaced it. It was a major surgery. I thank God that
I am safe and back to Nigeria.
In your absence, a lot has happened. The relationship
between President Yar’Adua and the National Assembly
snapped a bit at a time. What is your view on how this democracy
can fare with such frictions?
Frankly speaking, although I was out of the country, I was
getting information from home. To the best of my knowledge,
I think President Yar’adua has had a good relationship
with the members of the National Assembly. I still believe
that he has had a wonderful liaison with them. With what is
going on in the world today, it can be understood. You see,
the world is passing through a phase. There is a general phase
of difficulties sweeping through everywhere in the world.
Prices of things have gone high. All over the world, there
is inflation, and it is universal. Many students of history
say it occurs once after many hundreds of years. We are passing
through a phase. It is complaint everywhere and here in Nigeria.
You can also see that we are having problems of inflation.
Prices have gone up. I believe, really, that it calls for
co-operation between the legislature and the executive, at
local government, state and national levels. They should be
able to maximise the use of our resources to the people. I
would like them to have an excellent rapport and co-operation.
It is an important ingredient for any successful democratic
practice.
Some Nigerians accuse the president of being too slow
and not having done enough to show that he can fix Nigeria.
What is your view?
I don’t agree with them because frankly, the president
is a member of my party, the PDP. I knew President Yar’Adua
many years ago. His elder brother was a friend. Their father,
who was a minister, was known to my family. I know that he
had a good family upbringing, which of course, has matured
him to the present lofty heights. As governor of Katsina State,
he did well. If you go to Katsina and find out what happened
in the eight yeas of his tenure, you will doff your hat for
him. With this rich background, we believe he will excel in
this new task.
He is capable. A leader leads a team. He has a formidable
team of advisers, and ministers who will help him steer the
ship of state. He will give direction and give vent to his
vision. When he assumed office, things were really bad. The
major problem, I think, is electric power. Power was extremely
bad at the time he took over. There is nobody, who does not
know that. It is a problem that has defied solution. I understand
that in my absence, the National Assembly subjected the power
problem to inquisition. I think it is still going on. It has
been a major problem. Other problems are hinged on it. If
you tackle the power problem, others can be easily solved.
Democracy goes with good leadership and independence of the
various arms of government.
Today, the judiciary is completely independent. Some years
ago, it was clear to us that the judiciary was not independent.
As for the ordinary person, it was a burden. We can move about
freely. Now, take a look at other areas. I have been able
to map out programmes like Due Process when I was chairman
of the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA). I had a glimpse
into the mechanism of government policy implementation. Most
of the things you see being unfolded now, will not mature
immediately. Some of them take about two, three or four years
to mature. After all, he has been in office for only one year.
I think it is too early to assess him.
When I was in Washington, I heard many people complain that
the president was sick and may not continue in office. This
is not true. I was able to address people in Washington and
I told them that the president is certified fit. At a stage
in America, their president was using a wheelchair. The most
important thing is the constitutional provision. If a president
is absent from office for a determined number of months, he
will certainly lose his job. But Yar’Adua’s case
is different. He is in office and working. He only goes for
medical check-up, which is normal. Many presidents in the
past have gone for medical check-up. So, I don’t see
anything wrong with that. It is not right for Nigerians to
protest that because the president is sick and goes for medical
check-ups, he should be removed. I don’t think that
is proper. I believe Nigerians should give him a chance. I
think he will do well.
Also in your absence, a notable godfather in PDP,
Chief Lamidi Adedibu died. Do you believe his death marks
the end of godfatherism in Nigerian politics?
There is nowhere in this world where you don’t have
what Nigerians call godfatherism. When you go to any system,
there are people who are serious there. There are leaders
there. These are people who take decisions. You must be able
to get yourself close to them, study them, know what they
are doing, be part of them, so that you can know what qualities
in them took them to where they are. It is the same thing
that is happening in politics in Nigeria.
So, I don’t think that type of system will stop. There
is no time in politics in Nigeria when you won’t have
people who have been there. You will always have leaders and
they must exercise their powers in accordance with the constitution
of the party. But what I am opposed to, is people exercising
powers outside the constitution of the party or the country.
If someone by violence or coercion, appropriates by force
power that belongs to the party, I think it is wrong and should
not be condoned in any democratic society. Otherwise, what
is necessary is to go through the process. If you want to
run for an office, you go through the primaries. Every party
has a constitution that allows primaries as long as we don’t
abuse or rig the primaries, or someone comes and cancels it.
The problem is not whether there is godfatherism or not. The
problem is people abiding by the constitution of the party
and the country. This is very important. It is a fundamental
prerequisite for every system that will endure.
The Electoral Reforms Committee has flagged off public
hearings. What do you consider necessary as inputs for a perfect
electoral system in the country?
I am terribly disturbed over what has happened in the past
few years. This trend of people trying to cling to power by
all means is very, very bad. The hope of any common man in
a democracy is to have his rights. For instance, our Constitution
in Nigeria has given every leader four years with a possibility
of another four years and he is out. That is the limit. If
the person fails to perform in four years, it is the right
of the people to use their votes to remove him. If the system
makes it impossible for the people to exercise this right,
that is what I consider wrong. This has happened here in the
past. The notice is clear that there was election, but it
was rigged in many places. People say it is party A or B.
It is not true. If you watch while you have Party A in power,
it will continue to be in power, even when they are not doing
well.
For instance, states that were controlled by other parties
remained in control of the states even when other parties
worked hard to take over power. It is not a question of PDP
rigging. It is a matter of the character of Nigerians. It
is in the character of Nigerians, not a matter of party. Nigerians
have that knack of staying in power by all means, irrespective
of whether they are in PDP or ANPP or whatever party they
are. Even in local governments, you notice that once somebody
is in power, he continues there. What has saved us is that
the Constitution prescribes two terms’ limit. Otherwise,
people will stay in office for life. You see what is happening
in Zimbabwe? It could have happened in Nigeria. So the electoral
reforms are important. It will make our electoral system free
of unwanted provisions and go some distance in stemming the
tide of rigging. Much depends on the character of Nigerians.
Nigerians must change their ways completely.
The problem in this country is money. Everybody is looking
for money. This has affected our democracy. Democracy thrives
when there is a strong opposition. Without opposition, democracy
is nil. If you notice in this country, after every election,
a party wins. One expects the losing party to work hard and
form a cabinet of shadow offices to shadow the government.
Opposition parties should have their ministries of finance,
transport, education and so on. They have to shadow the government
to know where they have gone wrong. We don’t do that
in Nigeria. What they do is they talk of sharing the booties
of government. If they get some offices or ministerial appointments,
they forget about their rights to form opposition, which is
very important. As long as Nigerians fail to understand that
there is dignity in opposition, we are not getting it right.
Opposition is recognised all over the world. Here in Nigeria,
everyone wants to be part of the government and participate
in cake-sharing. It is one of the greatest problems of democracy.
No matter what we do, we must get this perception re-examined.
So, it is not only bad, in seeking for appointment from the
opposing side, we need to re-examine ourselves. The quest
for money is the whole problem. People have taken money to
be everything. In Nigeria, you hear of one person stealing
billions of naira. It is unique. Let somebody ask, what is
he going to do with it? Somebody takes millions of pounds,
what is he going to do with it? If somebody is 50 years old
today, and he has N50 million in a fixed deposit, he won’t
finish it until he dies. If this money is left, it will create
happiness for him. Today, our banking system has improved.
Nigerians don’t have any reason to keep their money
outside Nigeria. I used to buy credit card from other countries,
but since the banking reforms, things have changed. This time,
I travelled with a credit card from Access Bank. It served
me all over the world. I was in America, it was well accepted
everywhere. So, I don’t see why Nigerians cannot bring
back the money they have abroad. Nigerians have billions of
pounds and dollars abroad. If they bring it back, the economy
will flourish. The economy needs the money. The banks will
have so much money and the business class can secure facilities
to set up companies and employ people.
Critics of Yar’Adua argue that his cabinet is
weak and needs change. Also, the chairman of your party is
seen in some quarters as biased in some disputes in some states.
What do you say?
Any president should be able to re-examine his cabinet because
that is his power. If the cabinet is unable to perform, it
is the President that the people will hold responsible. Presidents
must know that they are accountable to the people and must
be able to satisfy their yearnings and aspirations. It is
the duty of the President to lead aright and ensure that his
ministers perform. These ministers were appointed based on
certain political considerations. I believe that after one
year, the President should be able to review their performance
and be guided accordingly. If there are shortcomings, make
sure they are removed, because if there is a failure, Nigerians
will blame the President, not minister.
The issue of PDP and the handling of disputes, I am hearing
it from you for the first time. I have been in this for many
years. There is no time mediation in any political dispute
can be accepted by all interests in the dispute. To be the
chairman of a political party is a difficult job. You are
supposed to take difficult decisions. You will step on every
kind of toes, toes of powerful people, not-so-powerful people,
but human beings all the same. If you want to be honest and
just, it is difficult. So, whether it is by consensus or not,
decisions are usually not accepted by all parties. If it is
a question of nomination, I won’t be surprised. But
it does not mean that the chairman is not doing well. I don’t
believe that. He is capable. He has worked with me and I know
he is capable. He was a minister and later, secretary of the
party. So, I believe he has the experience.
Who should appoint INEC chairman? The President, National
Assembly, a college of political parties or the National Judicial
Council?
To be honest with you, it is a serious matter. The job of
INEC chairman is quite challenging. It is just who appoints
the Chief Justice of the country. I believe that the chairman
of INEC should be appointed in the same way the Chief Justice
of the country is appointed. This is because in political
terms, the burden he carries is big and I believe that the
process of his emergence should be credible and non-controversial.
I have not studied this carefully but I am convinced it is
too high a position to be treated with levity in the appointment
process.
I also want to speak on the economy. There is a lot of unemployment
and poverty in Nigeria. I am worried. If you get to Imo State,
for instance, we have about five or six institutions of higher
learning and every year, they churn out graduates in many
disciplines. You have Alvan Ikoku, FUTO, College of Agriculture,
Polytechnic Nekede and so on. We also have in Abia, Anambra
and in other states. The problem is that some graduates who
left school more than five years ago are in the job queue.
Thousands of them. It is a big threat. It is better you don’t
give someone education at all than educate him and leave him
out in the cold.
We know that a society does not owe anyone a living but any
society that offers one education up to university level,
should give him an opportunity to make a living. In Nigeria
today, there is no such opportunity. I think something must
be done. It is a time bomb. It seems to me also that it is
helping in furthering criminality in the society - kidnapping,
armed robbery, prostitution. Government must do something
now to ensure that this matter is addressed. Without the banks
in the last three years, we would have been in a terrible
mess. They came to the rescue. It is getting to a point where
the banks can no longer employ.
The people working in banks today are young. They are not
going to retire in the next 30 years and yet graduates are
churned out yearly. If the government has not raised a committee
yet to look into this matter, they should do it now. On my
part, now that I am okay, Iwuanyanwu Foundation is going to
start a programme of job creation for the youths. We are commissioning
some studies on job creation for Nigerians and whatever we
can do to support them, we will do. We believe that most of
them should be given opportunities to float their own small
businesses and they will in turn employ other Nigerians. I
have a daughter who graduated as a lawyer. I invited her to
come and work with us. She refused. She set up her own business
and today, she is employing over 26 people. She is from a
business family and I am sure she will do well. Not everybody
is from a business family. But if others are also given opportunities,
they will do well.
|