Reps confused on anti-smoking
bill –ERA
By DANIEL
ALABRAH Abuja
Friday, October 24, 2008
The Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth, Nigeria
(ERA/FoEN) has condemned the passage of an anti-smoking Bill
by the House of Representatives, saying the lower legislative
chamber had compounded the issues as they affect tobacco use.
It also described provisions in the new Bill as several steps
backward in efforts by the government and civil society groups
in the country to reduce tobacco consumption and its attendant
health, social, economic and environmental costs.
The House of Representatives on Tuesday passed a Bill which
raised the fine on smoking in public places to N50,000, four
months imprisonment or both. The existing Tobacco Control
Act 1990 (formerly Decree 20, 1990), which the new Bill sought
to repeal, had prohibited smoking in public places across
the country. The Act, however, stipulated a fine of between
N200 and N1,000, one month imprisonment or both for offenders.
ERA in a statement issued by its Programme Manager, Akinbode
Oluwafemi, said the promoters of the Bill appear to have deliberately
ignored all the gains that had been recorded in tobacco control,
fuelling suspicion that it may have been influenced by tobacco
industry lobbyists since there are on-going efforts to enact
a comprehensive national tobacco control law.
According to the group, Nigeria signed the World Health Organisation
(WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) on June
20, 2004 and ratified the convention on October 20, 2005,
adding that by ratifying the convention, it was obligated
among several other provisions to ban all forms of tobacco
advertising, sponsorship and promotion, raise taxes on cigarettes,
as well as make public places smoke-free.
“There is really no excitement but lots of suspicion
about what the House of Representatives has done. They merely
raised the fine on smoking in public.”
This falls short of what Nigerians are expecting. This falls
short of Nigeria ‘s treaty obligations. It looks very
much like an attempt to legislate tobacco industry wishes
through the back door,” Oluwafemi said.
The environmental advocacy group also expressed worries that
the Bill excluded the classification of airports as public
places. It also excludes total ban of tobacco advertising,
sponsorship and promotion when the same House passed a Bill
prohibiting those activities in March 2001.
“Nigerians are just shocked that our House of Representative
has passed a bill to make it legal to smoke at check-in counters,
customs check counters and other offices in our airports contrary
to a directive by the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria
(FAAN) and the global practice of declaring airports tobacco-free.
No one expected a debate about whether an airport is a public
place or not, and that is why the whole world is suspicious
of this bill”, Oluwafemi added.
The group advised the Senate to ignore the Bill, arguing that
what the nation needed at this time was the full domestication
of the FCTC, which includes among others comprehensive ban
of tobacco advertising, sponsorship and promotion; increased
taxes on tobacco products to discourage youth smoking; protection
of non-smokers from tobacco smoke (tobacco-free public places);
mass education about the dangers of smoking and assistance
to people who want to quit.
|