| |
|
BIG
HAMMER!
Britain goes tough on Africa players,
others
....Says speak English or forget about playing football in England
By GBOLAHAN DADA
Monday,
May 12, 2008
 |
Photo:
Sun News Publishing |
| |
Football stars across the world are in for another tough
treat, as United Kingdom comes out with points system to cut
influx of immigrants every year.
According to the UK Daily Mail newspaper, top players like
Ronaldinho, Lionel Messi and as well as illiterate players
from Africa could be refused entry into Britain, unless they
can prove they speak good English.
Latest ruling by Britain’s government indicates that
footballers signed from non-EU nations, including Nigeria
and other West African countries, must be able to pass an
English test before they can join Manchester United or Chelsea.
Brazilian, Argentine, Senegalese and South Korean footy wizards
will be grilled on everyday phrases and simple conversation
under a tougher, new, points-based immigration system aimed
at slowing down the flood of foreigners into the country.
British ministers have decided sportsmen and women should
not get special treatment under the new rules. It could spell
the end of the invasion of extravagantly paid sportsmen from
South America and elsewhere. Even in cases where foreign athletes
do meet the criteria – speaking English, finding a willing
employer and having enough cash to support themselves –
they must secure approval from the sport’s governing
body.
But one wonders just how many homegrown British footballers
would actually pass the test? The clubs are doubtless relieved
the rules apply to the likes of Carlos Tevez, rather than
Jermaine Pennant. Then there is the much-maligned practice
of “tapping up” potential targets. Now, overseas
clubs only have to look out for English language tutors sneaking
into their players’ villas to know that something is
afoot.
Seriously, though, because this really is a serious subject,
after all, the move would appear to be connected to a broader
global crisis, which we shall refer to as “The Big Four
and World Domination.”
Excuse the melodrama but it seems necessary, giving the absurd
situation in which we find ourselves: we’re coming towards
the end of one of the most memorable-ever seasons of English
and European football, yet newspapers and websites are full
of the most ludicrous twaddle.
Kevin Keegan started it all off with his interview after Chelsea
beat his team on Monday night to set up a thrilling Barclays
Premier league finale, and Sepp Blatter carried it on with
a critique of this season’s Big Four-dominated Champions
League.
"This league is in danger of becoming one of the most
boring but great leagues in the world," said Keegan,
with a turn of phrase which may have caught the ears of Britain’s
new immigration invigilators.
He added: “The top four next year will be the same top
four as this year."
Keegan may actually have got that bit right. Study the BPL
league tables for the past decade and it’s easy to identify
a trend towards the top four finishers accruing even more
points than ever. In the season ending in 1998, they picked
up 283 points between them. In 2001 they amassed 287. Now
consider the totals for the past four seasons: 2005 yielded
316 points, in 2006 they grabbed 323 points, 2007 saw them
slip slightly to 308, but this season has seen the Big Four
earn 321 points with this weekend’s four games still
to go.
But does that automatically make the BPL boring?
It depends what one wants. The billions of BPL fans worldwide
apparently relish each season’s battle for the top spot
involving the Big Four. Should they demand a competition in
which as many as six or eight teams vie for the league title,
then how about this proposal: let’s abolish the UEFA
Cup and the Carling Cup.
In England, the Big Four have the resources in terms of squad
strength to successfully compete in three or four different
competitions without losing power but clubs like Everton and
Aston Villa do not. Whenever they are involved in the UEFA
Cup, their domestic seasons fall short of the top four finish
they promise early in the campaign. Then you get a side like
Tottenham who win the Carling Cup and effectively have nothing
else to play for over the last three months of the season.
Across Europe the UEFA Cup also exists to distract the next
best teams outside the top four. Fiorentina's form has certainly
suffered as a result of the UEFA Cup, which has allowed AC
Milan to recapture fourth position.
I honestly believe there are clubs in every major European
league which could break the dominance of the established
powerhouses and, at the very least, focus on earning a champions
league spot each season.
Now, let’s turn to Mr. Blatter.
“Shall we let the rich become richer and say nothing?”
spluttered the man who lords over the cash cow that is FIFA.
"The big money is coming out of the Champions League.
It's the biggest league in the world and practically 80 per
cent of the income goes directly to the 32 participating clubs.
"The Champions League has been very successful financially
but it has also favoured national inequality.”
Blatter was basically using this as an excuse to reiterate
his proposal that teams field five homegrown players.
"This rule,” he declared, “will be fighting
against the monopolies of clubs and leagues. We are not fighting
the problem of money but for the identity of national teams."
It was unfortunate Mr. Blatter made those comments just days
after Zenit St Petersburg smashed Bayern Munich 4–0
in the UEFA Cup. Yes, the same Bayern that spent 108 million
dollars on players last summer.
UEFA president Michel Platini made a far more valid point
recently –, as did Steve McMahon and our Football Focus
pundits this week. They suggested the real danger posed by
financial inequality in football comes not when clubs are
able to buy the likes of Ronaldinho, Kaka and Messi but rather
when the Big Four and their continental counterparts weaken
smaller clubs by buying Scott Parker, Michael Carrick and
Steve Sidwell and turning them into squad players.
Can the like of Keegan and Blatter convince talented players
to shun big money moves to the Big Four? If they can come
up with the rhetoric needed to convince the likes of Micah
Richards or Gareth Barry of the need for loyalty ahead of
financial advancement, then they will have passed my language
test with flying colours.
|