Fred Itua, Abuja
A Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court has said it will fix a fresh date for the hearing of the criminal trial brought against Kenny Martins by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
Justice Modupe Adebiyi had earlier fixed April 28, 2020 for the hearing of the matter, but due to pending cases arising from the lockdown, the court is expected to fix new hearing dates and communicate same to the parties accordingly.
The EFCC is prosecuting Kenny Martins, the coordinator of the Police Equipment Fund (PEF), following his alleged connivance with three others to embezzle about N7,740,000,000 (Seven Billion Seven Hundred and Forty Million Naira) belonging to the Police Equipment Fund.
The EFCC had appealed against the judgment of Justice Mohammed Talba of a FCT High Court, Gudu, which discharged him and his co-defendants, Ibrahim Dumuje, Joni Icheka and Cosmas Okpara, after he upheld their “no-case submission” on November 24, 2009.
Dissatisfied with the verdict of the lower court, the EFCC approached the Court of Appeal in Abuja, asking it to set aside the judgment on the grounds of perverse verdict and miscarriage of justice.
In its decision over the matter, the appellate court had on June 28, 2012, upheld the argument of the EFCC, insisting that its appeal was meritorious.
The Court of Appeal had further in its landmark judgment read by Justice Regina Nwodo, held that Justice Talba erred in his judgement and consequently ordered the Chief Judge of the FCT High Court to reassign the case to another judge for re-trial.
But as the EFCC was getting set to rearraign the defendants, Kenny Martins proceeded to the Supreme Court, asking the apex court to set aside the decision of the Court of Appeal.
The Supreme Court, however, on March 23, 2018, dismissed Kenny Martins appeal, thus finally giving the green light for the commencement of his trial.
Thus, the EFCC amended the charges against Kenny Martins and other defendants and arraigned them before Justice Adebiyi on January 15, 2020 for their various alleged roles in forging Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) documents to facilitate the PEF fraud among other allegations.