A principal witness, CSP Umar Babangida,  yesterday, alleged that Grace Taiga, former director, Legal Services in the Ministry of Petroleum Resources,  played a major role in the fraudulent gas supply agreement between the Federal Government and Petroleum and Industrial Development (P&ID).

Testifying in an FCT High Court in Abuja, Babangida, informed the court that he led the team that investigated the alleged  fraudulent activities of the P&ID.

“We opened an investigation as a result of a petition forwarded from the office of the Attorney General of the Federation to the acting Chairman of the EFCC in July 2015.

“The team wrote a letter of investigation to the Ministry of Petroleum Resources, requesting the Ministry to provide the Gas Supply and processing agreement dated Jan. 11, 2010.

“We also asked them to provide the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), dated July 22, 2009 which was signed between the Ministry of Petroleum Resources and P&ID.

“Upon analysing the two documents, we observed that the MOU was signed by P&ID Nig Ltd while the Gas Supply and Production agreement was signed by P&ID Ltd, a company registered in the British Virgin Island,” he said..

He said that the then minister of Petroleum Resources, Deiziani Allison-Madueke ,signed for the ministry of Petroleum Resources while the defendant witnessed for the Ministry.

Related News

“On the strength of this response, we then wrote a letter to the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC), to confirm if the Gas Supply and Processing Agreement (GSPA) was forwarded to the commission from  the Ministry to enable the Federal Executive Council make a decision.

“ICRC replied that the GSPA was not forwarded to the commission and the Federal Executive Council had not deliberated on it.

“Based on their reply, we wrote a letter to the office of the Secretary -General, to confirm if the GSPA was forwarded to them for the Federal Executive Council to deliberate on.

“The office of the Secretary -General replied that it did not get to them. As a result of this, we then wrote to the Bureau of Public Procurement to confirm the role they played.

“Their response was that after going through their archive and records, they discovered that the Bureau wasn’t contacted in any way and as such was not  involved in the agreement.” he said

The witness also explained that a list of members of the technical team, which Taiga was on,, was provided by the ministry.