NO doubt, two phenomena that have sprang up on the African continent namely the persistent xenophobic violence of black south Africans against other black Africans living in south Africa, and the nearly month-long closure of all land borders by the Nigerian president Muhammadu Buhari constitute cogs in the wheel of any sort of progress for African integration. These two developments bring to the fore the larger question of whether African Union and ECOWAS are dead and buried.
On one hand, the cases of constant xenophobic violence targeting other black Africans by the indigenous black south Africans can be considered such an unfathomable evil like genocide to an extent that both in substance and by the circumstances may not be equated to the political decision of Nigeria’s Muhammadu Buhari to close the nation’s land borders, but looking too at the import of the formation of the sub-regional bloc of Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), it would seem that the decision of Nigeria to shut the borders is a grave blow to the essence of setting up the sub-regional economic bloc. The persistence of both developments show that the internal crises resolution mechanisms of the African Union and ECOWAS are non-functional or even non-existent.
Whilst reflecting on the incapacity of the two organisations to resolve internal issies such as the twin social evils of Xenophobia and unilateral border closure, we are however reminded of the core arguments of those who support the decision of Nigeria at this time to shut off the borders in which they pointed to the nexus between that decision and the concept of sovereignty of Nigeria. But looking at the bigger picture, we can as well conclude that the consistent criminal acts of xenophobia in south Africa has in a very big way questioned the essence, relevance and import of African Union which purports to push for greater economic integration amongst Africans. Incidentally, both South Africa which has become notorious because of the xenophobic violence and Nigeria which is becoming increasingly cynical of brotherly sub-regional neighbors leading to the shutting of the land borders, both nations were big players in the evolution of both African Union and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).
South Africa was the venue that birthed the transformation of organization of African Unity into African Union. Nigeria on the other hand was pivotal in the formation of ECOWAS in the 70’s and is till date the home of the secretariat of this sub-regional bloc. So, in a sense, an observer who sets out to examine the growing incidents of xenophobic attacks in South Africa and the effects of the decision of Nigeria to shut her land borders, would be left with a straightforward conclusion that ECOWAS and AU have lost their bearings and would therefore require resetting and fine tuning. Although to be honest, the African Union did not just start losing her relevance of recent, the body has become a laughing stock internationally for failing to institutionalize good governance on the continent, spread constitutional democracy as it were, and by so doing promote economic prosperity of member nations which would have prevented the larger scale irregular migration of African youth to the west.
It is not in doubt that African Union has faltered in not doing so much to stop the economic collapse of a lot of African nations and prevent outbreaks of wars and terrorists attacks that have created the new refugees crisis in Africa.
The credibility crises tearing down the fabrics of African Union only became much more toxic with the constant outbreaks of xenophobic violence in South Africa. What then are the objectives and relevance of both African Union and ECOWAS if such disturbing signals keep springing up and getting out of control? Why for instance does neighboring nations to Nigeria not adhere strictly to the laws governing law-based imports and why do they flood the Nigerian markets with substandard goods and refuse to be subjected to the extant rules on customs and excuse? It will also be right to ask where the so-called African unity is and the quest for greater economic integration in Africa for Africans when blacks in south Africa are subjected to the odium of constant xenophobic killings?
Recall that the African Union (AU) was officially launched in July 2002 in Durban, South Africa, following a decision in September 1999 by its predecessor, the OAU to create a new continental organization to build on its work. It would be recalled that the decision to re-launch Africa’s pan-African organization was officially the outcome of a consensus by African leaders that in order to realize Africa’s potential, there was a need to refocus attention from the fight for decolonization and ridding the continent of apartheid, which had been the focus of the OAU, towards increased cooperation and integration of African states to drive Africa’s growth and economic development.
Those who administer the website of African Union noted that AU is guided by its vision of “An Integrated, Prosperous and Peaceful Africa, driven by its own citizens and representing a dynamic force in the global arena.”
Also, the Constitutive Act of the African Union and the Protocol on Amendments to the Constitutive Act of the African Union lay out the aims of the AU which amongst other progressive objectives are: a) Achieve greater unity and solidarity between African countries and their the people b) Defend the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of its Member States; c) Accelerate the political and socio-economic integration of the continent. Then, looking at the sub-regional body called ECOWAS, here are the aims and objectives of ECOWAS: to promote cooperation and integration, leading to the establishment of an economic union in West Africa in order to raise the living standards of its peoples, and to maintain and enhance economic stability, foster relations among Member States and contribute to the progress and development of the African Continent.
In order to achieve the aims set out in the paragraph above, and in accordance with the relevant provisions of this Treaty, the Community shall, by stages, ensure;the harmonization and coordination of national policies and the promotion of integration programmes, projects and activities, particularly in food, agriculture and natural resources, industry, transport and communications, energy, trade, money and finance, taxation, economic reform policies, human resources, education, information, culture, science, technology, services, health, tourism, legal matters; the harmonization and coordination of policies for the protection of the environment;the promotion of the establishment of joint production enterprises;the establishment of a common market through: the liberalization of trade by the abolition, among Member States, of customs duties levied on imports and exports, and the abolition among Member States, of non-tariff barriers in order to establish a free trade area at the Community level.
These well outlined objectives are breached with reckless abandon by those who signed these treaty. For instance, smaller economies such as the landlocked country of Benin Republic has always been found wanting in the area of aiding and abetting massive smuggling of goods and services into the Nigerian economy for a long time and Benin is also the most attractive destination for smuggled premium motor spirit stolen from Nigeria. Benin is accused of flooding Nigeria with hundreds of thousands of agricultural products thereby stiffling the local agro-allied industry in Nigeria.
To that extent, an observer will apportion the greater blame for the weakening and erosion of the essence of ECOWAS treaty on the attitudes of these other smaller neighbouring nation’s to Nigeria. But why is Nigerian border security too weak and why are the immigration and custom services so corrupt and why is the Nigerian President not throwing away the corrupt and inefficient hierarchies of the two compromised bodies who also aid and abet smuggling? As we look t the border closure and the consequences it has brought to such other countries like Ghana, Niger and Benin Republic, we should be mindful of the retaliatory strikes against Nigerians doing legitimate businesses in those other nations bearing the brunt of the total land border closure by President Muhammadu Buhari.
Now to the bigger issue of African Union vis-a-vis the Xenophobic attacks, we must note that South Africa faced a spate of boycotts recently. The presidents of Rwanda, Democratic Republic of Congo and Malawi decided not to attend the World Economic Forum on Africa hosted by South Africa in the face of ongoing looting and burning of small businesses in that country owned largely by African immigrants, local media reported on Wednesday.
The chairman of the African Union Commission Moussa Faki Mahamat has condemned the attacks, which have seen scores of people arrested in Johannesburg and the capital Pretoria. Reports said Zambia had also cancelled a friendly football match with South Africa’s national men’s team Bafana Bafana scheduled for March.
Onwubiko Heads Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA)